TMGT303 - Risk Management top assignment 代写



                            TMGT303 - Risk Management

Group Assignment

Enterprise Risk Management Framework

Due Week 9 (at start of lecture)

Value: 25 percent of final marks

Background

In the unit we cover a wide range of risk management activities. This assignment and the associated group student presentations will enable us to examine and compare risk management frameworks for different types of companies / organisations.
 

Your Mission

 
You are required to create a hypothetical business and to develop an Enterprise Risk Management Framework (ERMF) for that organisation.
 
Each student group should choose a different business type and liaise with the Lecturer to ensure a suitable mix is achieved across all groups. Choose from: Listed Public Company.
 
You must use research and use supporting industry information along with risk, governance and control related literature to synthesise, critically evaluate and support the details within your Enterprise Risk Management Framework document.
 
As a guide you should include as a minimum:
·        Cover page with list of contents
·        Executive Summary which includes a summary of the structure and how it will help an organisation to manage its risks
·        Background to your hypothetical organisation
·        Diagrammatic view of your Enterprise Risk Management Framework (ERMF).
·        Your document should include the Enterprise Risk Management Structure including:
o   Key risk and control Committees
o   Key risk related roles and responsibilities
o   Strategy and Policy
o   Risk Management techniques/activities/processes for ensuring that risks are identified, assessed and managed
o   Oversight and monitoring activities
o   Conclusion
 TMGT303 - Risk Management top assignment 代写


 

Instructions / Rules

1.    Ensure you have included sufficient industry information along with risk, governance and control related literature to synthesise, critically evaluate and support the details within your Enterprise Risk Management Framework document.
2.    The document should have appropriate headings, subheadings and page numbers. 
3.    Use the Harvard Referencing rules.
4.    This work should be in one document such as Microsoft Word.  This assignment should be typed using times new roman font size 12, 1.5 line spacing and double that between paragraphs, with appropriate headings and attention to spelling and grammar.  The report should not exceed fifteen (15) pages (excluding the list of references).
5.    It is TOP policy that assignments cannot be submitted late without prior approval of the unit coordinator and only in extenuating circumstances supported by evidence. Assignments submitted late without prior approval will not be graded.
6.    Before attending class you must submit your work to the Unit’s Turnitin.
7.    You should also physically hand your lecturer a hard (printed) copy of the assignment prior to the commencement of the lecture.
8.    Your assignment must have the correct TOP cover sheet attached and the declaration must be signed.
9.    Attach a copy of the summary Turnitin result page to your hard (printed) copy assignment.
10. Ensure a thorough edit and spell check using English (Australian not American).
 

TMGT303 - Risk Management top assignment 代写

TMGT303 - Risk Management

Assignment Rubric

Group Assignment - Enterprise Risk Management Framework

Value: 25 percent of final marks

	Fail (0-49)	Pass (50-64)	Credit (65-74)	Distinction (75-84)	High Distinction (85-100)	Total
Structure	Lack of focus with poor structure across the document.           0-12.25 marks	Clear purpose and context. Weak structure across the document. Good use of headings and sub-headings.       12.5-16 marks	Appropriate use of structure.  Information is presented in a logical sequence that clearly addresses the questions asked.   16.25-18.5 marks	Student presents information in a logical and well structured way, which the audience can follow with some additional interest     18.75-21 marks	Student presents information in a logical, informative, structured and engaging manner, where the audience can follow the key messages, recommendations and issues.   21.25-25marks	/25
Critical thinking, analysis & synthesis	Very little or no evidence of understanding of the topic.       0-12.25 marks	Some understanding of the topic evident but with little evidence of analysis.       12.5-16 marks	Understanding of the topic evident – some critical thinking with analysis and synthesis of available literature 16.25-18.5 marks	Good understanding of the topic with evidence of critical thinking with deep analysis and synthesis of information     18.75-21 marks	Very high level of understanding of the topic with insightful evaluative comments and conclusions.     21.25-25marks	/25
Appropriate linkage across each section of the document	No attempt to link each section across the document.         0-12.25 marks	General linkage across each section of the document.           12.5-16 marks	Good linkage across each section of the document. The reader can still learn something about the Topic.     16.25-18.5 marks	All of the work is aligned and has solid connections between each section of the document. The reader learns something more about the Topic.   18.75-21 marks	Clear linkage across each section of the document demonstrating a compelling story across the entire document. Provides the reader with new insights.   21.25-25marks	/25
Research and Referencing. Mechanics and Language	No evidence of additional research or reading.  Students work has spelling and grammatical errors. Poor referencing.     0-12.25 marks	Some research and additional references although poor quality or not related to the Topic. Spelling and grammatical errors.  Limited referencing.       12.5-16 marks	Evidence of research and reading with some quality references mostly related to the Topic.  Some spelling and grammatical errors.  Some errors with referencing. 16.25-18.5 marks	Evidence of research and reading with some quality references all related to the Topic.  Minor errors with spelling/grammar or referencing.       18.75-21 marks	Evidence of wide reading/research and inclusion of quality references (including academic references) related to the Topic.  No spelling or grammatical errors.  Referencing is appropriate.   21.25-25marks	/25
					Total Points:	/100
						/25 TMGT303 - Risk Management top assignment 代写

 
 




TMGT303 - Risk Management top assignment 代写