代写 MGNT803 management assignment
Key to performance level against criteria elements Excellent - consistently outstanding shows additional insights or originality evident. Very good- with useful critical insights frequently demonstrated Satisfactory -accurately and provides basic interpretations Limited – lack of understanding or misinterpretations Very limited - low level, numerouserrors of accuracy, lack of understanding or misinterpretations; Unsatisfactory - fails to meet minimum standard of quality. |
Excellent 81-100% |
Very good 61- 80% |
Satisfactory 41 -60% |
Poor 21-40% |
Very Limited 1 – 20% |
Unsatisfac. 0% |
Mark | |
Knowledgeable understanding of two research articles for an OB topic (worth 3 marks) · One article is selected from Weeks 2-4 set readings; one is independently researched. · The OB topic selected is evident and elaborated upon throughout the annotated bibliography. · Main arguments from articles are correctly identified. · Statements on any theories mentioned in the articles are accurately interpreted. · The purpose, and type of research and key findings from both articles are accurately described. |
/3 |
|||||||
Critical analysis of one selected research article (this section is worth 12 marks) · A succinct and accurate summary of the research article content and purpose is provided. · A critique of the article’s main arguments is provided using justifications from the article data and/or professional experience. · An explanation of the relevance or value of the article for the OB topic is provided. · Insights from personal/professional or other subjects/experiences add further value to demonstrating critical writing and perspectives on the issues identified in the research article. |
|
|
|
|
/12 |
|||
Critical comparative analysis of two research articles (this section is worth 12 marks) · A comparison between the two research articles is explicitly provided. · Strengths/weaknesses, advantages/disadvantages or any other bases of comparisons are justified clearly with data evidence or through logical statements. · A perspective on how the two research articles contribute to better understanding of the OB topic is provided. · Insights from personal/professional or other subjects/experiences add further value to demonstrating critical writing on the OB topic and its trends. |
|
|
|
|
/12 |
|||
Proficient academic writing style (this section is worth 3 marks) · Uses clear and logical paragraph structure and presentation of submission. · Uses accurate business terminology for the selected topic with correct English expressions that are free of spelling and grammatical errors. · In-text and reference list citations conform to Harvard referencing style. |
|
|
|
/3 |