新南威尔士CSR代写:企业社会责任和规制理论

一个商业记者报道一个爆炸性的消息：Whitehaven Coal证实了新南威尔士州政府已经批准其tarrawonga煤矿扩建，在gunnnedah盆地，威胁到了国家森林三有争议的项目上。怀特黑文煤炭官方网站（2013）描述斑溪煤项目位于冈尼达盆地的心和在关键基础设施近在咫尺。这是大约18km东北博加布赖只有从铁路干线服务煤炭码头在纽卡斯尔港16公里，这是360km东南部的项目。对Whitehaven Coal，斑溪是一个重要的促进经济增长的项目。然而，一些环保主义者如Jonathan Moylan（2013），“潜在的监禁不可怕威胁斑溪煤矿”。Jonathan Moylan是煤炭前线的行动成员，他将向公众表明，澳大利亚和新西兰银行集团（ANZ）计划取消斑溪项目贷款。这导致了怀特黑文的市场价值缩水3亿1400万美元短。从以上描述可以得出结论：煤炭产业的扩张将给社会和企业带来良好的经济效益，但对人民的健康和环境有害；企业热衷于扩张，环保主义者坚决反对。选择短期的经济利益，还是社会的长远发展，是一个问题。在的情况下，怀特黑文的煤矿扩建引发争议。为了防止延伸，环保主义者Jonathan Moylan做了一个大的动作，他面对的是一个坐牢的。最后，新南威尔士州批准怀特黑文煤矿扩建。本文旨在探讨在冈尼达盆地和斑溪地区开采的问题。运用企业社会责任和规制理论，寻找能够满足公司发展、资源有效利用和环境保护等多种需要的途径。本文将首先讨论案件中涉及的主要问题。它会分析问题，从企业社会责任和监管两个方面挖掘在冈尼达盆地和斑溪地区。在此之后，它将解释谁承担最大的责任为怀特黑文继续在冈尼达盆地和斑溪地区煤矿开采。在新闻中，我们知道，新南威尔士州批准怀特黑文煤矿扩建。无论是矿山企业可以在一个地方存在和延伸，它不仅是重要的企业本身，也包括地方政府的许可，法律和行业规则允许和环境保护组织的明显冲突。最后，将讨论是否应怀特黑文主席继续经营这些矿山或不。如果继续经营，那地方会发生什么事？

新南威尔士CSR代写:企业社会责任和规制理论

Paddy Manning（2013）, a business reporter reported an explosive news : Whitehaven Coal has confirmed the NSW government has approved an expansion of its Tarrawonga coal mine, the last of three controversial projects in the Gunnnedah Basin that threaten the Leard State Forest. The official website of Whitehaven Coal (2013) describe that Maules Creek Coal Project is located in the heart of the Gunnedah Basin and is within close proximity of critical infrastructure. It is approximately 18km north-east of Boggabri and only 16km from the main railway line servicing the coal terminals at the Port of Newcastle, which is 360km south-east of the project. For Whitehaven Coal, Maules Creek is an important boost growth project. However, for some environmentalists such as Jonathan Moylan (2013),"Potential jailing not as scary as threat of Maules Creek mine". Jonathan Moylan is a member of Front Line Action on Coal and he lays to the public that Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ) plans to cancel to Maules Creek project loans. It caused Whitehaven's market value shrunk by $314 million short. From the above description we can draw the conclusion: coal industry expansion will create good economic benefits to the society and enterprises but it is harmful to people's health and the environment; company is keen to expand, but environmentalists are firmly opposed to. To choose the short-term economic interests, or the long-term development of the society, it is a problem. In the cases, Whitehaven’s mine expansion caused controversy. In order to prevent the extension, environmentalists- Jonathan Moylan made a drastic move and he is facing a jail time. At last, NSW approves Whitehaven mine expansion. This paper aims to explore the question of Mining in the Gunnedah Basin and Maules Creek Areas. Use the theory of corporate social responsibility and regulation, to find the way that can satisfy various needs such as the company development, effective utilization of resources and environmental protection. This essay will firstly discuss the major issues involved in the case. It will analysis the problems from two aspects of corporate social responsibility and regulation in mining in the Gunnedah Basin and Maules Creek Areas. Following this, it will explain who bears greatest responsibility for Whitehaven’s continued mining of coal in the Gunnedah basin and Maules Creek areas. From the news, we know that NSW approves Whitehaven mine expansion. Whether a mining enterprise can presence and extension in a place, it is not only matters the enterprise itself, but also includes the local government’s permission, the laws and industry rules allow and the unobvious conflicts with environmental protection organization. Finally, it will discuss whether should the Chairman of Whitehaven continue operating these mines or not. If it continues operating, what will happen in that place.