这个访谈节目是关于校园里的难民和妇女。这是一个关于反对派的政治问题。观众问，为什么反对采取行动通过丑化难民而不是使用有效的方法来保护妇女谁是容易受伤的，为什么他们就不能承认大选潜在的种族主义情绪很明显。朱莉作为反对派的代表回答了这个问题，其他嘉宾也参加了讨论，并就这一问题和她的回答与她进行了辩论。事实上，她在这个节目中演得不好，我们来分析一下。
尽管如此，我还是选择了另一次访谈来展示她与其他人的互动，以便与这场秀相比较。在这次采访中，她在社交媒体上表现很好。这次采访被命名为“朱莉主教：关于托尼·阿博特、女权主义和死亡凝视”。这是关于朱莉和记者关于朱莉本人的互动。（Mamamia Team，2012）
这次面试很成功，朱莉在面试中表现出了她的智慧。然而，她在问答节目中的表现并不是那么令人愉快。我们可以总结出这些问题。她没有很快地进入关键话题，所以观众会厌烦的。她和主人争论时没有一套好的逻辑。她太冷静了，语速跟节目的速度不一致，所以托尼一再打断她。托尼是需要控制节目时间的主持人，所以他需要打断朱莉的慢速词汇。她的非言语交流是不够的。她总是带着严格的表情，很少有手势。
针对这些问题，提出了一些建议。她应该很快获得正确的话题，讲话速度更快获得听众的关注。朱丽亚可以在她和减少距离的听众有更多的手势和表情。此外，要冷静自信，逻辑上说服别人。然后，朱丽亚的自我介绍在社交媒体上会好得多。
墨尔本代写Media assignment:社交媒体与公众人物
The public figure I want to choose to analyze is Julie Bishop, who showed up in the ABC program Q&A on March 4. Julie Bishop is the Deputy Leader of the Opposition and shadow minister for foreign affairs in Australia now. Christine is the first woman to lead a political party in Tasmania. She is known on social media for her withering stare.
In this essay, I will analyze Julie’s performance in Q&A program and also compare it to Julie’s other performances publicly in social media. What’s more, I can give some my recommendations according to the theoretic knowledge and the feelings of myself.
This talking show was about refugees and women on campus. And it was a political issue about the opposition. The audience asked the question that why the opposition took actions by vilifying refugees instead of using effective ways to protect the women who were easy to get hurt and why they just couldn’t admit it was an appeal for an election campaign to underlying racist sentiment. Julie, as the representative of the opposition, answered the question and also, other guests also joined the discussion and argued with her about this problem and her answer. Actually, she didn’t do well in this show and we will analyze this.
Still, I also choose another interview to show her interaction with others to compare with this show. In this interview, she had a good performance in the social media. The interview is named ‘Julie Bishop: On Tony Abbott, feminism &death stares’. It is about the interactions of Julie and the reporter about Julie herself. (Mamamia Team, 2012)
The interview was a success and Julie showed her wisdom during the interview. However, her performance in Q&A program was not that pleasing. We can conclude the problems. She didn’t get into the key topic quickly so the audience would get tired of that. She failed to have a good logic when arguing with the host. She was too calm and the speaking speed didn’t match the show’s speed, that’s why Tony interrupted her again and again. Tony was the host who needed to control the time of this program, so he needed to interrupt Julie’s low-speed words. Her non-verbal communication was not enough. She was always wearing a strict expression and rarely did she have a gesture.
According to the problems, some suggestions can be put out. She should get to the right topic quickly and made the speaking speed faster to get hearers’ attention. Julia can have more gestures and expressions during her talking to decrease the distance to the hearers. Moreover, be calm and confident and argue logically to convince others. Then, Julia’s self-presentation will be much better on the social media.
