Introduction to Technical Article Review 代写
100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129
Introduction to Technical Article Review 代写
1
Assessment 2 Article Review and Poster
Diploma of Engineering
Diploma of Information Technology
Introduction to Technical Communication
EITC001 IITC001
SEMESTER 03 2017
Credit points : 6
Pre-requisites : none
Subject Coordinator : Julie Sparks
Weight: 25%
Due Date: Week 5 (Article Review) Week 5 (Poster)
ASSESSMENT TASK 2 : LESSONS LEARNT IN ENGINEERING AND IT –
ARTICLE REVIEW AND POSTER PRESENTATION (WEIGHT 25%)
TASK DESCRIPTION
Students individually investigating an engineering or IT failure. One source is selected
on the case study for analysis according to the scaffold taught in the subject. A poster
is created to inform the class about the topic.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• (a) understand the role and value of communication in academic and professional
engineering and IT environments
• (b) use the UTS Library and Internet to access information using research and reading
skills
• (c) write competently in English, in a variety of genres, demonstrating your knowledge
of referencing, synthesis of information and the rules of plagiarism
• (d) participate effectively in peer learning activities
• (e) perform competently in oral communication situations with appropriate visual aids
• (f) demonstrate an ability to express technical and other concepts through
graphical/mathematical/visual communication
• (g) demonstrate creativity in presentations
• (h) reflect on personal learning experiences
Note : The information in this subject outline was correct at the time of printing. However, you should check
eStudent regularly for any updates to the information contained in this subject outline.
2
BRIEF
Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review 900 words 20%
Students investigate an engineering or IT event where there were lessons learnt that can be
applied to future projects. The failures or events do not have to be catastrophic and can relate
to process, maintenance, human error, construction techniques, design etc. Students can
choose from a list of topics or, in consultation with their Tutor, nominate their own. Students
find ONE (1) suitable and reliable source on their Lessons Learnt case study. The source
should ideally be around 2-6 pages. Students should focus on the background to the event
rather than the lessons learnt. Include peer review checklist with your report.
Questions that COULD be answered include:
• When did the event occur?
• Who did it involve?
• Where did it happen?
• What happened?
• Why or how did it happen? What was the cause?
• Who was responsible?
• What was the cost – lives and money?
• Anything else of interest – but NOT engineering lessons learnt.
Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Poster Presentation 5%
Students prepare a one page poster and have one-two minutes to tell the class about their
topic.
The poster is presented in class Week 5. Students can select their own creative way to present
the poster but it must be single page shown on computer screen. Presentation must introduce
the topic to the class. Poster should contain both text and graphics. Poster should be
uploaded to TURNITIN before presentation.
DUE DATE
Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review
Due Week 5
Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Two Minute Poster Presentation
Due Week 5
3
STYLE GUIDE REQUIREMENTS
• Each written task must be stapled.
• Submission is via hard copy. TURNITIN is a plagiarism check.
• Submit a soft copy of each written task to Turnitin and a hard copy to your tutor at the
start of class. Include a signed UTS:INSEARCH cover page.
• Print single or double sided A4 paper.
• Use 12 point Arial or Times New Roman font.
• Use 1.5 spacing and at least 2.5cm page margins.
• Include a header and footer on each page with:
o Header: subject name and code, title of assessment task
o Footer: your name and student number, page number
NOTES
Your assignment must be free of plagiarism and be written by yourself without assistance.
Late assignments will not be accepted unless there are exceptional circumstances and/or you make
arrangements in writing with the tutor before the due date. (See the subject description for further details.)
If your assignment receives a pass mark or higher, the mark is final. Your tutor will explain why you
were awarded the mark, but cannot change it.
Always keep electronic and/or hard copies of your assignments. Things can go wrong and
assignments can go missing. If they do, it is your responsibility to be able to re-submit your work
when requested.
4
Assessment Criteria
HD D C P
1
Layout and
Introduction
identification,
academic reliability
10%
Assessment followed
style guide.
Exceptionally well set
out. Exceptionally clear
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability. Includes
second source for
verification.
Assessment followed
style guide. Very well
set out. Clear
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability. Includes
second source for
verification.
Assessment followed style
guide. Well set out. More
than satisfactory
identification of text, and
analysis of its academic
reliability of the text.
Assessment followed
most elements of style
guide. Well set out.
Basic identification of
text, and analysis of its
academic reliability.
2
Introduction
purpose, preview
10%
Exceptionally clear
enunciation of purpose
and preview of textual
analysis and
exceptionally concise
and comprehensive
overview of the main
sections and purpose of
the source text.
Clear enunciation of
purpose and preview of
textual analysis and
concise and
comprehensive overview
of the main sections and
purpose of the source
text.
More than satisfactory
enunciation of purpose
and preview of textual
analysis and more than
satisfactory overview of
the main sections and
purpose of the source text.
Basic enunciation of
purpose and preview of
textual analysis and
satisfactory overview of
the main sections and
purpose of the source
text.
3
Evidence of Active
Reading
15%
Richly detailed evidence
of active reading and
notes was submitted.
Questions/answers are
detailed and well-
paraphrased. Full,
Harvard-UTS styled
reference is present on
notes.
Richly detailed evidence
of active reading was
submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present
on notes.
Sufficiently detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present on
notes.
Passably detailed
evidence of active
reading was submitted.
Questions/answers are
well-paraphrased.
Important details of
references are present
on notes.
4
Summary
20%
Excellent summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
Very good summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
Good summary of main
points and the relationship
between them.
Adequate summary of
main points and the
relationship between
them.
5
Conclusion 10% Excellent summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Excellent details
of further research.
Very good summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Very good details
of further research.
Good summary of report
and concluding statement
of relationship of text to
the semester topic. Very
good details of further
research.
Adequate summary of
report and concluding
statement of relationship
of text to the semester
topic. Good details of
further research.
6
Referencing
5%
In-text reference present
and correct. End-of-text
reference present and
correct
In-text reference present
with only insignificant
errors or omissions
and/or end-of-text
reference present with
only insignificant errors
or omissions.
In-text reference present
but with minor errors or
omissions and/or end-of-
text reference present but
with minor errors or
omissions
In-text reference present
but with significant
errors or omissions
and/or end-of-text
reference present but
with significant errors or
omissions
7
Language and
paragraph structure
10%
Meaning is very clear.
Paper has consistently
correct grammar,
spelling and paragraph
structure.
Meaning is very clear.
Paper has predominantly
correct grammar,
spelling and paragraph
structure.
Meaning is clear. Paper
has only insignificant
errors in grammar and/or
spelling and/or paragraph
structure.
Meaning is generally
clear. Paper has a few
errors in grammar and/or
spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
8
Poster Presentation
20%
Research was presented
in a very clear way with
excellent voice, eye
contact and body
language. Poster was
engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way with very
good voice, eye contact
and body language.
Poster was engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way with good
voice, eye contact and
body language. Poster
was engaging.
Research was presented
in a clear way. One
element of voice, eye
contact or body
language hindered
presentation. Poster was
engaging.
5
Assessment Criteria
F3 F2 F1 F0
1
Layout and
Introduction
identification,
academic reliability
10%
Assessment followed
most elements of style
guide. Well set out. Weak
identification of text,
and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
Some elements of the
style guide missing.
Layout and presentation
poor. Unsatisfactory
identification of text
and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
Style guide not followed.
Layout poor. Does not
include identification of
text, and/or analysis of its
academic reliability.
No identification of
the text or analysis
of its academic
reliability
2
Introduction
purpose, preview
10%
Weak enunciation of
purpose and/or preview of
report and/or less than
comprehensive overview
of the main sections of the
text or purpose missing.
Report and/or text preview
and/or purpose may be
missing.
Report preview and
purpose missing or text
preview and purpose
missing.
No purpose and
preview.
3
Evidence of Active
Reading (SQ3R)
15%
Passably detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted. Questions/
answers are well-
paraphrased. Important
details of reference are
missing on notes.
Passably detailed
evidence of active reading
was submitted but large
sections of the
questions/answers are
either not paraphrased or
are poorly paraphrased.
Important details of
reference may be missing
on notes.
Evidence of active reading
was submitted but is
sparsely detailed
AND/OR no source was
submitted
No evidence of
active reading was
submitted.
4
Summary
20%
Inadequate summary of
main points and/or the
relationship between
them.
Incomplete summary of
main points and/or very
weak relationship
established between them.
Very weak and incomplete
summary of main points
and/or no relationship
established between them.
No summary of main
points.
5
Conclusion 10% Weak summary of report
or concluding statement of
relationship of text to the
semester topic. Weak
details of further research.
Very weak summary or
Introduction to Technical Article Review 代写
concluding statement of
relationship of text to the
semester topic. No details
of further research.
No summary of report
and/or concluding
statement does not relate
text to the semester topic.
No details of further
research.
No conclusion.
6
Referencing
5%
In-text reference present
with serious errors or
omissions and/or end-of-
text reference present but
with serious errors or
omissions.
In-text reference mostly
incorrect and/or end-of-
text reference mostly
incorrect.
In-text reference missing
and/or end-of-text
reference missing.
No referencing.
7
Language and
paragraph structure
10%
Overall meaning is clear.
Paper has some errors in
grammar and/or spelling
and/or paragraph
structure.
Overall meaning is
understandable. Paper has
many errors in grammar
and/or spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
Some parts are hard to
understand. Paper has
many errors in grammar
and/or spelling and/or
paragraph structure.
Report unreadable.
8
Poster Presentation
20%
Research was presented
in an understandable way
however one or two
elements of voice, eye
contact or body language
hindered presentation.
Poster was reasonable.
Poster was not loaded on
to TURNITIN.
Presentation was not very
clear or did not discuss
the case study. Poster was
cluttered and/or hard to
understand. Poster was
not loaded on to
TURNITIN.
Presentation was difficult
to understand and / or no
poster was prepared.
Poster was not loaded on
to TURNITIN.
No presentation.
Introduction to Technical Article Review 代写
