代写 PHIL2647/3647: Philosophy of Happiness

  • 100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129

    • 代写 PHIL2647/3647: Philosophy of Happiness

    PHIL2647/3647: Philosophy of Happiness
    (First Semester, 2016)
    Take-Home Exam
    —————————————————————————————————
    Submission details: The take-home exam is due by midnight on Wednesday 15 June.
    Exams must be submitted on-line via Blackboard.
    Answers should be typed and proper referencing is required.
    Late Submissions: Note that the conditions for submission of take-home exams differ
    from those for essays: late take-home exams WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED without a
    special consideration application.  This means that you cannot simply submit late
    without special consideration and expect to receive a late penalty (late submissions
    without a special consideration application will receive a mark of 0).
    Exam Questions: You should answer two of the following questions. The overall
    word count of the exam is 2000 words (so write approximately 1000 words per
    question).
    Q1. Do examples of ‘happy immoralists’ (such as Cahn’s example of Judah
    Rosenthal) prove that the happy life is not identical with the good life?
    Q2. Can someone desire to be unhappy? If so, is such a desire necessarily irrational?
    Q3. Kahneman and colleagues have conducted studies that show that people
    sometimes prefer more pain to less (Kahneman, D., B. L. Fredrickson, C. Schreiber,
    and D. A. Redelmeier. 1993.When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end.
    Psychological Science 4: 401-5.) What explanation does Kahneman offer for this
    phenomenon? Is someone who prefers more pain to less necessarily being irrational?
    Q4. Are there some desires that we ought not have in order to be happy? And if so,
    can we eliminate such desires and make ourselves happier?
    Q5. If someone was born with a genetic predisposition towards neuroticism and
    introversion, to what extent would that  determine  her future level of happiness? If a
    medical procedure could radically alter these personality traits, should she take it?
    Q6. Does increased choice make us less happy? If so, should individual choice be
    paternalistically restricted?
    代写 PHIL2647/3647: Philosophy of Happiness
    Q7. Does increased wealth cause increased happiness? What, if any, implications
    might this have for government policy?
    Q8. Does increased religiosity cause increased happiness? What, if any, implications
    might this have for our reasons to adopt religious belief?
    Q9. Does evolutionary psychology provide meaningful insights into the causes of
    unhappiness?
    Q10. Can happiness be validly and reliably measured? Does the ability to do so affect
    the usefulness of happiness as a concept for guiding decisions about how to live?
    Q11. Should governments seek to promote the greatest happiness of the greatest
    number?
    代写 PHIL2647/3647: Philosophy of Happiness