ATS1262: Understanding Social Behaviour Major essay 代写

100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129

ATS1262: Understanding Social Behaviour Major essay 代写

Assessment criteria: major essay – ATS1262

ATS1262: Understanding Social Behaviour

Assessment Rubric: Major essay Percentage of overall unit marks: 30%

The goals of the major essay assessment are to:

1) improve students’ understanding of some of the contemporary issues regarding human behaviour in the social context;

2) strengthen students’ ability to read and understand scientific papers;

3) practice synthesizing diverse viewpoints and discussing the reasons for contemporary arguments in the field;

4) develop an appreciation of the psychological and socio-cultural mechanisms underpinning understandings of the self and interactions with others;

5) practice evaluating sources of information and research-based arguments; and

6) learn better how to research and prepare a report, research paper or other project.

Major essay

Writing is an essential part of communication in any field, and learning how to write an essay will help you to perform better in any subject asking you to conduct

independent research. This assessment is designed to teach you how to make sense of scientific debates, evaluate the research literature, and craft a valid argument

based upon the available evidence

ATS1262: Understanding Social Behaviour Major essay 代写.

Article selection: Please draw upon the articles you sourced in the week 3 pre-class activity, the literature review assignment in week 7, and the book you sourced in

the pre-class activity in week 8. Drawing upon readings in the course and wider reading in the academic literature is encouraged. A minimum of five quality

references is expected with a maximum of fourteen to fifteen at most. More than this number of references is likely to saturate your original writing with other

people’s work and compromise the fluidity of your essay. Use in-text citations. Referencing should be consistent and preferably follow APA format.

The essay will draw upon relevant research and theory to build a logical argument and discussion of behaviour in its social contexts. Students will choose a focus

topic to examine, analyse and critique. In the conclusion, students are prompted to suggest possible directions for future research (i.e. not just that future research

is necessary, but the kind of research that is needed to answer future research questions). Students must submit the final version of this assignment to both

Turnitin and to the standard Moodle submission tool.

State clearly what is the main focus of the paper. Build a logical argument: your argument should be clear and logical. An excellent paper will avoid broad

generalisations, will be objective in considering evidence, and will address counterarguments to what you propose. Use evidence to support your argument: Your

argument should be based on empirical evidence that comes from studies that are clearly described. The evidence to support your assertions should be clear.

The essay should be straightforward, clear, and easy to follow. Your paper should be well-organised and written for a professional audience. The paper should be

carefully edited and proofread before submission. In preparation for this assignment, students will have a chance to work on their essay outline in the week 9

tutorial and share their essay writing hints in the post-class forum activity.

Word limit: lower limit: 1700

upper limit: 2000

Assessment criteria: major essay – ATS1262

Student name: Student ID:

criterion high distinction distinction credit pass fail

quality of

sources

Exceptionally well-connected

research articles from top tier peer-

reviewed academic journals.

Well-connected research

articles from peer-reviewed

academic journals.

Well chosen peer-reviewed

journal articles.

Minimum number of peer-

reviewed journal articles.

Fewer than 1+5 articles.

Not peer-reviewed.

Unrelated articles.

Comprehension

and

Communication

skills

Work demonstrates a deep

understanding of the chosen

research literature.

Excellent ability to discriminate

between evidence, interpretation,

opinion and fact in evaluating

theories and concepts.

comprehension of of research tools

and methods, including highest

quality peer-reviewed sources.

Research shows excellent grasp of

current work in the field of research.

Work demonstrates sound

comprehension of the

chosen research literature.

Sound ability to

discriminate between

evidence, interpretation,

opinion and fact in

evaluating theories and

concepts.

Strong sense of debate

and use of specialized

materials.

Work demonstrates good

comprehension of the chosen

research literature.

A good ability to discriminate

between evidence,

interpretation, opinion and fact

in evaluating theories and

concepts.

Good sense of an academic

debate.

Work demonstrates

satisfactory comprehension

of the chosen research

literature.

An adequate ability to

discriminate between

evidence, interpretation,

opinion and fact in

evaluating theories and

concepts.

Reasonable sense of an

academic debate.

Essay demonstrates inadequate

research skills.

Poor selection of sources.

Collection of articles is

unfocused or does not contain

sense of debate.

Accuracy &

organization

Citations are complete and accurate.

Material is exceptionally well

organised.

Citations are complete and

accurate.

Material is well organised.

Minor inconsistencies.

Material is well organized with

only inconsequential

inconsistencies.

Material has minor, albeit

inconsequential, errors in

formatting and organisation.

Citations are incomplete.

ATS1262: Understanding Social Behaviour Major essay 代写

Citations are inaccurate.

Not well organized or confusing.

Quality of

argumentation

Key points are very well written, well-

reasoned, and offer an excellent

explanation and description of the

contemporary debate. The central

argument also demonstrates

independent thinking.

Key points are well written,

draw upon sound

evidence, and reflect a

clear understanding of the

contemporary scientific

debate.

Key points are reasonably well

reasoned and draw upon

appropriate evidence from the

literature.

Key points are good but

poorly argued.

Arguments are reasonably

well written.

Arguments are plagiarized

(automatic failure).

Key points are poorly written.

Key points do not draw upon

sound evidence.

Grammar,

spelling, and

essay structure

Writing is clear, concise & direct with

no grammatical or spelling errors.

Arguments are clearly signposted

and exceptionally well-written.

Writing presents very clear sense of

scientific debates, including the role

of new discoveries.

Engaging writing style.

Writing is clear, concise &

direct with minimal errors

or phrasing issues.

Arguments are clear.

Signposting is effective.

Writing style is clear and

unambiguous.

Summary is clear, concise and

largely error-free.

Student has some sense of

the importance of the scientific

debate beyond simply the

summaries of articles.

Makes some spelling or

grammatical errors, but

writing generally readable.

May need better

proofreading.

Over relies on quotation.

Largely summarizes the

material without adding new

insight or sense of debate.

Persistent writing problems such

as no proofreading.

Does not demonstrate ability to

describe the significance of the

articles.

Over relies on quotation.

Confusing or fragmented.

Adjustments/penalties: Assessment submitted on time? Yes [ ] No [ ] Extension granted ? Yes [ ] No [ ]