Introduction to Global Business BUS 201 全球商务代写

100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信：120591129

1Introduction to Global Business BUS 201 全球商务代写

Introduction to Global Business

Assessment Guide

SESSION 1, 2017

Department of Marketing and Management

MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY

FACULTY OF BUSINESS & ECONOMICS

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT

BUS 201 - ASSESSMENT GUIDE

General Assessment Information

General guide to how to submit report

 Submit a hard copy to BESS and online before the deadline. Submission on an earlier

date to your tutor is acceptable.

 Submit an electronic copy to Turnitin on iLearn for plagiarism checking (NOTE:

electronic submission is NOT a substitute for the hard copy, if we do not receive a hard

copy from you by the due date, you will receive zero marks for the assessment)

 The marking rubrics and peer assessment forms for each assessment are available at the

end of this document

Remember your team report must be your own work. Therefore, your assignment must be

submitted to Turnitin on iLearn. A link to Turnitin and instructions on how to submit an

assignment to Turnitin will be provided through iLearn.

Please note that when submitting your essay and report you must include the following:

• Cover sheet with student/s name, student ID number, tutorial/class enrolment number,

tutorial day and time and Turnitin receipt number;

• Turnitin receipt email. This email provides time and date proof of assignment

submission to the Turnitin system; and

• Turnitin receipt number on the cover sheet of your assignment

Any submission not containing a student cover sheet with a Turnitin receipt number, a

print out of the Turnitin Receipt email stating time/date of submission will not be marked.

In terms of the report, each team (and each member) is responsible for assessing its level of

plagiarism. Although you can submit the report to Turnitin as many times as you like before

the due date, only the final submission will count to Turnitin.

1. ASSESSED COURSEWORK

The individual assignment is worth 20% of your final grade.

Submission: A hard copy must be submitted to your tutor in class at the time of your

tutorial for each week of assessment.

Extension: No extensions for this assessment task will be granted except for cases

in which an application for Disruption to Studies is made and approved

Penalties: No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 10% of the

total available marks made from the total awarded mark for each 24 hour period or

part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in submission –

20% penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases in which an application for

disruption of studies is made and approved. No submission will be accepted after

solutions have been posted.

Each student is expected to submit tutorial coursework throughout the semester. This

comprises of weekly short answer and essay questions as well as any further tutorial

assessment. From the assigned coursework two random weeks will be assessed of which the

best one (20% each totalling 20%) will form your final mark. The required format for the

assignment is either short answer or essay.

Coursework will be handed in to your tutor during your tutorial in multiple weeks throughout

the semester. This may follow different formats and will be random in nature i.e. different

from one tutorial to the next. It is expected that you prepare for each tutorial by attending

lectures, completing readings and doing any required homework.

Please note that you will not simply be provided a mark for submitting work. The work

should be of an appropriate academic standard and will be marked accordingly.

2. REPORT & PRESENTATION

Submission: A hard copy of the report must be submitted to BESS by Week 10

- Monday 4pm. Submission on an earlier date to your tutor is acceptable. You will

need to submit a soft copy to Turnitin on iLearn for plagiarism checking (NOTE:

electronic submission is NOT a substitute for the hard copy, if we do not receive a

hard copy from you by the due date, you will be penalised as per the guidelines

below). The presentation component will be submitted in tutorials in Weeks 10-13.

The exact time and date of your presentation will be worked out with your tutor.

Extension: No extensions for this assessment task will be granted except for cases

in which an application for Disruption to Studies is made and approved

Penalties: No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 10% of the

total available marks made from the total awarded mark for each 24 hour period or

part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in submission –

20% penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases in which an application for

disruption of studies is made and approved. No submission will be accepted after

solutions have been posted.

The mark is divided up between the report and presentation contributions. The

report is worth 20 marks (20%). It is due in Week 10 Monday 4pm to BESS and

via Turnitin. The presentation is worth 20 marks (20%). It is due from Week 10-

13. The exact time and date of your presentation will be organised with your

tutor.

REPORT

In the same team as you joined at the beginning of semester you will develop a 4000 word

written REPORT on the details below:

You have been asked to write a report outlining how Australia would be able to build

sustainable, national competitive advantage in one of the following industries.

- Business consulting industry

- Construction industry

- Agricultural industry

- Video games industry

- Pharmaceutical industry

- International education

- Fashion industry

- Airline industry

- Film industry

- Retail banking industry

- Investment banking industry

- Travel industry

Your report should draw upon Porter’s theory of national competitive advantage as the basis

of your analysis.

In the body of your report you will need to provide the following

- Brief outline of the key theory

- Outline the current position and issues of the Australian industry you have

chosen

- Outline and justify what industry strategies and government policies you would

recommend be adopted to improve Australia’s position in the industry for the

short and long term.

As this is a team exercise all members of the team are expected to contribute actively and

substantially. While it is understood that some members of the team may have different input

in the research and the written component the team will be required to acknowledge that all

team members have given quality time to the project.

While writing your report, you should incorporate relevant theories and concepts to justify your

arguments. Remember to acknowledge your sources throughout the paper using the Harvard

referencing system (in-text referencing).

The report is to be typed and 1.5 spaced (a standard 12 point font should be used). It should

be checked for spelling, consistency and clarity of expression.

Your report should incorporate at least 20 different references. These can be sourced from

the following:

 Academic articles

 Relevant textbooks

 Periodicals

 Newspapers

 Relevant online sources

The 20 references need to be evenly balanced between these five resource options.

Examples of all of these reference options are detailed in this outline.

PRESENTATION

Based on the report each team is expected to present their findings. Each member of the team

will be marked on their individual presentation i.e. not as a team. Although your presentation

will be presented as a team you will be individually assessed based on the marking criteria

attached to this assessment guide.

It is expected that the team covers the following key areas of the report

- Outline the current position and issues of the Australian industry you have

chosen

- Outline and justify what industry strategies and government policies you would

recommend be adopted to improve Australia’s position in the industry for the

short and long term.

Each team member will give a presentation that will not exceed 3 minutes. There will be an

emphasis on your presentation style and delivery of content.

Presentations will start in Week Ten in tutorials and it is expected that you will provide a

printed copy of the slides to the tutor along with the presentation. Although your presentation

will be presented as a team you will be individually assessed based on the marking criteria

attached to the unit guide. It is expected that every team member participates equally.

REPORT AND PRESENTATION

No extensions will be granted. Late tasks will be accepted up to 72 hours after the submission

deadline. There will be a deduction of 10% of the total available marks made from the total

awarded mark for each 24 hour period or part thereof that the submission is late (for example,

25 hours late in submission – 20% penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases in which an

application for unavoidable disruption is made and approved.

All team work is peer moderated (see Appendix 1)

Following the Group Report and Presentation each student will submit a peer evaluation

assessment for each member in their team (including themselves). This will then allow a peer

factor to be allocated to the Team’s raw score for each individual student, allowing a dispersion

of marks within the same team. This peer factor is kept confidential. (See Appendix 1)

4. FINAL EXAM

The FINAL EXAM is worth 40% of your final grade

The final exam will be set during the exam period. The format of the final exam will be outlined

in the final weeks of the course.

You are expected to present yourself for examination at the time and place designated in the

University Examination Timetable. The timetable will be available in Draft form

approximately eight weeks before the commencement of the examinations and in Final form

approximately four weeks before the commencement of the examinations.

http://www.timetables.mq.edu.au/exam

The only exception to not sitting an examination at the designated time is because of

documented illness or unavoidable disruption. In these circumstances you may wish to

consider applying for Unavoidable Disruption. The University’s policy on the unavoidable

disruption process is available at

http://students.mq.edu.au/student_admin/exams/disruption_to_studies/

If a Supplementary Examination is granted as a result of the unavoidable disruption process

the examination will be scheduled after the conclusion of the official examination period.

(Individual Faculties may wish to signal when the Faculties’ Supplementary Exams are

normally scheduled.)

The Macquarie university examination policy details the principles and conduct of

examinations at the University. The policy is available at:

http://www.mq.edu.au/policy/docs/examination/policy.htm

APPENDIX 1

STUDENT EVALUATION OF MEMBER PARTICIPATION

In order to encourage equal participation on the part of all team members, each team will

complete and turn in an evaluation of the team member (only for the Major Project team reports

and presentations). This evaluation will indicate the percentage of contribution of team

members to the team’s over-all performance. An evaluation must accompany each written

research project. Use the following format:

Tutorial Instructor________________________________________________________

Tutorial Team No_______ Date: ____________________

Team Project Name:______________________________________Mark___________

Each student should give each team member (including themselves) a participation mark out

of 100%. Individual marks are calculated by multiplying the paper grade by the percentage

awarded by peers. For example, if Joe Black was awarded 90% for his contribution to the

research project and his team received 36 out of 40 points for the project, Joe’s individual mark

would be 32.4%. Another student, awarded 100%, would receive 36 points.

Students can give each of the team members 100%. If this is done, each student receives the

mark that was awarded to the total project (in the above example, 36 points). No student should

receive 0% unless the student really did nothing to contribute to the completion of the project

(for example, did not go to meetings, did not complete assigned tasks, and did not contribute

to the conceptualisation of the project).

In completing this form you should take into account:

1. Willingness of the individual to carry out jobs assigned

2. Ability of the individual to meet deadlines

3. Co-operation with other team members

4. Quality of the individual’s work

Student Name %

Participation

Individual

Mark

Signature

Team Agreement - Team Project/Presentation Formation

In order to encourage commitment on the part of all team members, each team member will

sign this Team Agreement which defines how the team will operate during the conduct of the

Team Project. Each member of the team is to sign below to indicate that they will abide by the

conditions of the agreement as set out below.

Tutor Name__________________________ Team No:_____ Date: _______

Tutorial Time____________

Name_____________________________________________

Student ID Student Name Email Signature

1. Team Contact: ______________________________________ Mobile :___________________

2. Manage Meetings: Time Required/When/Where/Frequency?

____________________________________________________________________________

3. Measure Performance? – Meeting deadlines, grammar,

etc____________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________

4. Team Goal(s)? HD, D, equal workload, attend all meetings, etc

__________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

5. Resolve problems/conflict/lack of co-operation/disruptive behaviour, etc?

__________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

6. Team Members Obligations (e.g. attend meetings on time; do all assignments on schedule; avoid

personal conflict; allow free flow of ideas; listen to everyone; take personal responsibility for

outcomes; inform people of decisions; make a file note after every meeting of future action steps

and responsibility, help other team members to build their skills

_______________________________________________________________________________

7. How to share the workload?

__________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

8. Quality Audit? (e.g. grammar, referencing, meeting of assignment requirements, layout, etc)

________________________________________________________________________________

BUS 201 Individual Assignment – Marking Matrix and Feedback Summary Sheet

Not

attempted

Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Understanding of

questions and IB

environment (50%)

– Analysis of relevant

IB systems and

context

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources.

Introduction to Global Business BUS 201 全球商务代写

Fails to answer the

question or misinterprets

the questions.

Demonstrates minimal

understanding of relevant

theory/concepts. Fails to

meet the basic criteria of

the assignment.

May focus on only some

aspects of the questions.

Demonstrates a basic

understanding or analysis

of the relevant

theory/concepts

Responds to most aspects of

the questions. Demonstrates

some understanding and

analysis of key aspects of

the relevant theory/concepts

Responds to all aspects of

the questions.

Demonstrates a good

understanding and analysis

of the relevant

theory/concepts

Fully responds to all aspects

of the questions.

Demonstrates advanced

understanding and analysis

of the relevant theory.

Suggests possible

extensions of

theory/concepts

Quality of argument

Depth of analysis

(40%) – Application

of IB theory to

assignment

questions.

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources

Presents ideas in a

confusing way.

May simply describe

superficial aspects of topic

with little critical analysis.

Draws irrelevant

conclusions. Fails to meet

the basic criteria of the

assignment

Structures argument with

some flaws in logic.

May simply restate or

describe with little critical

analysis. Draws limited

conclusions.

Satisfactorily structures

argument with credible logic.

May sometimes describe

rather than analyse or

evaluate.

Draws limited conclusions.

Develops a clear,

progressive and convincing

argument throughout the

work. Draws logical

conclusions

Develops a compelling

argument with creative

examples and defensible

generalisations.

Draws well-supported

conclusions.

Communicative

quality (10%) -

quality of writing,

format, spelling, word

choice

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources

Language is frequently too

informal for academic

purposes. Errors in

grammar make overall

meaning unclear. Errors in

spelling and presentation

distract reader. Fails to

meet the basic criteria of

the assignment

Language is occasionally

informal.

Errors in grammar make

meaning unclear in places.

Minor errors in spelling and

presentation may distract

reader.

Language is generally

appropriate for an academic

essay, with only occasional

minor errors in grammar,

spelling or presentation.

Writing style and

presentation are of a high

academic standard.

Writing style is exemplary

and of a publishable

academic standard.

General observations/comments

Mark: /20

BUS 201 Report – Overall Marking Matrix and Feedback Summary sheet

Not

attempted

Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Executive Summary

(10%) – Summary of

the reports most

salient points

Not attempted

or entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources

Does not identify key

features of the report or

many details are incorrect

or unnecessary. Fails to

meet basic criteria of

assignment.

Identifies most key features

of the report and details

are mostly correct,

although significantly more

detail may be needed.

Correctly identifies key

features of the report. Detail

is mostly correct, although

more detail may be needed.

Identifies key features of

the report with adequate

detail, summarising the

overall report.

Identifies key features and

provides plentiful detail.

Provides an outstanding

summary of the key themes,

ideas and conclusions in the

report

Critical analysis

(40%) - Analysis of

industry history and

current position.

Integration of IB

theory.

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources.

Little detail given. Minimal

connections between trade

theories and the chosen

industry. Demonstrates

minimal understanding or

application of relevant

theory. Fails to meet basic

criteria of assignment.

Some detail/ explanation

given. Demonstrates a

basic understanding or

application of relevant

theory.

Reasonable detail/

explanation given.

Demonstrates some

understanding and

application of key aspects of

relevant theory.

Detail showing some

insight.

Demonstrates a good

understanding and

application of relevant

theory.

Plentiful detail/Clearly

explained.

Demonstrates advanced

understanding of relevant

theory.

Recommendations

(30%) –Integration of

analysis with long

term strategic goals

of government and

industry.

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources.

Recommendations, if

suggested, not developed

or supported.

Sub-standard or no merit to

conclusions. Fails to meet

basic criteria of

assignment.

Recommendations are not

well developed and

supported

Conclusions are evident to

your critical analysis

Logically developed

recommendations supported

by evidence

Effective conclusions to your

critical analysis

Logically developed

recommendations clearly

supported by evidence

Comprehensive conclusion

to your critical analysis

Logical recommendations

developed in a scholarly

fashion supported by

evidence. Conclusion draws

argument together in an

influential and scholarly

manner from your critical

analysis.

Quality of research

(10%) - Application of

IB theory through

integration of high

quality sources.

Not attempted/

entirely or

significantly

plagiarized

from other

sources

Uses a small number of

references (fewer than the

minimum) concerning the

topic. Provides little

evidence of research on

the topic. Fails to meet

basic assignment criteria..

Relies extensively on

textbook, or limited other

sources. Provides little

evidence of research on

the topic. Meets the

minimum number of

references.

Uses some sources related

to topic, demonstrating some

evidence of research

Identifies key sources

Introduction to Global Business BUS 201 全球商务 代写

Introduction to Global Business BUS 201 全球商务代写